What is the real danger of allowing SMB 1 client to access files on legacy device (which is not SMB 2 capable) on the local network?

I have an old device which is not SMB 2 capable. Much has been written about danger of using SMB1 (eg. ). I would like to access files on this device from current Windows 10 client. Windows 10 still allows to enable SMB1 through checkbox "SMB 1.0/CIFS client" in "Turn Windows features on or off" in Control Panel. Is there any real danger for Windows 10 client by doing so?

1

1 Answer

If the old device server is not accessible from the internet and is not used for internet surfing, it's as secure as the rest of your local network.

In order for it to be infected, another device from the LAN must be infected first, then propagate the infection. I think that at this point the whole question of SMBv1 vulnerability becomes somewhat mute.

SMBv1 vulnerability is dangerous for larger networks. A modest home LAN should avoid SMBv1, but an old device disconnected from the internet cannot be used as an entry-point by an attacker.

For more information, see :

1

Your Answer

Sign up or log in

Sign up using Google Sign up using Facebook Sign up using Email and Password

Post as a guest

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

You Might Also Like