Must every manifold bundle be a fiber bundle?

$\begingroup$

I have been learning differential geometry from this lecture series by Frederic Schuller's. Here he defines a bundle (of topological manifolds) as

A triple, $(E, \pi, M),$ where $E$ and $M$ are topological manifolds and $\pi:E \longrightarrow M$ is a surjective and continuous function.

Here he defines a fiber bundle as

A bundle $(E, \pi, M)$ such that $\forall p \in M: \text{preim}_\pi \big(\{p\}\big) \cong F$ for some manifold $F$.

Using these definitions (which I hope are standard), does there exist some bundle of topological manifolds that is not a fiber bundle (i.e., has fibers that are not homeomorphic to each other)?

Sidenote, Schuller provides examples here and here of bundles over a set that are not fiber bundles, but the base set is not a manifold in either case, as he clarifies in this later video.

EDIT: I'll clarify that the $F$ in the definition of fiber bundle is intended to be the same $F$ for each point $p$, i.e., a fiber bundle is a bundle whose fibers are all homeomorphic to each other.

$\endgroup$ 8 Reset to default

Know someone who can answer? Share a link to this question via email, Twitter, or Facebook.

Your Answer

Sign up or log in

Sign up using Google Sign up using Facebook Sign up using Email and Password

Post as a guest

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

You Might Also Like