Conjugate root theorem confusion

$\begingroup$

For z^3 = 1, the conjugate root theorem is applicable here.

However for z^3 = -i, the conjugate root theorem is not applicable here.

I'm confused on why the -i is considered a non-real coefficient? Isn't it a constant, like 1 in the first line of my post?

I know that it can be expressed as i*z^0 but in maths, don't we consider numbers that aren't multiplied to a variable as a constant term?

For example for y = 2x + 1, we would call "1" as a constant term, not x^0 ha a coefficient of 1.

Thanks

$\endgroup$ 1

1 Answer

$\begingroup$

Nope, we do say that a constant term is a coefficient of $z^0$. When talking about the coefficients of a polynomial, we include the constant term as a coefficient.

You can think about the proof of the conjugate root theorem to understand why this is necessary. The proof works by showing that if $f(z)$ is a polynomial with real coefficients, then $f(\overline{z})=\overline{f(z)}$ for all $z$. In particular, if $f(z)=0$, this says $f(\overline{z})=0$ as well.

Now to prove that $f(\overline{z})=\overline{f(z)}$, you expand out $\overline{f(z)}$ and find that the conjugates ignore all the coefficients (since they're real) and leave you with just $f(\overline{z})$. To get the same constant term as $f(\overline{z})$, you need the constant term to be real too!

Here's an example of how this looks in practice. Say $f(z)=z^3+i$. Then $$\overline{f(z)}=\overline{z^3+i}=\overline{z^3}+\overline{i}=\overline{z}^3-i.$$ But that's not the same as $f(\overline{z})=\overline{z}^3+i$, because the constant term got conjugated! You need the constant term to be real for it to not change.

$\endgroup$ 2

Your Answer

Sign up or log in

Sign up using Google Sign up using Facebook Sign up using Email and Password

Post as a guest

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

You Might Also Like